On Vista launch day, the BBC Breakfast programme dedicated a special feature to Vista, presented by Maggie Philbin.  The only cons worthy of the segment was the confusing number of versions and she got it wrong when she stated there was only five versions when we all know different! The media and more importantly the general public find the five "models" confusing without taking into mind all the different options of OEM, upgrade, retail boxed, volume license, etc, etc.

See the article and video for yourself:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast/6311827.stm

Regards

John

(of the UK SBS Group)

The pros quoting direct from the already posted URL:

"Maggie told us that the new software had more of a 3D look, she described it as "eye candy" but that there were three main differences:

It has a "good" intuitive search tool allowing you to search everything at once including e-mail and pictures.

More flexibility when working with earlier documents, and enhanced security."

I've got no problem with having different versions with the classification and licensing of OEM, upgrade and FPP... the gripe is the large number of base models. However, when technology journalist think it is confusing then what chance does Joe Public have when buying their home or business system. Windows XP was confusing enough for end customers with Home, Pro and MCE versions. Most people would have preferred a simple Windows Vista for Home and Windows Vista for Business - both being the ultimate product. Maybe even have a version Windows Vista for Business Mobile that could have had Bit Locker on every business laptop.